Do Race and Ethnicity Matter? An Examination of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Perceptions of Procedural Justice and Recidivism Among Problem-Solving Court Clients
Author ORCID Identifier
Armstrong - https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6003-0031
Race and Justice
Over the years, a distinct body of research has emerged that examines procedural justice in problem-solving courts. However, there is virtually no research to date on racial and ethnic differences in perceptions of procedural justice among problem-solving court clients. The present study seeks to understand the complexities of judicial procedural justice and race/ethnicity within problem-solving courts. Using a convenience sample of 132 clients from two problem-solving courts in a southern state, this study addresses a void in the literature by examining the influence of race/ethnicity on perceptions of procedural justice as well as the impact of race/ethnicity and procedural justice on clients’ likelihood of recidivism. Results suggest that Black problem-solving court clients’ have significantly lower perceptions of procedural justice, while also having a lower likelihood of recidivism. Perceptions of procedural justice did not influence recidivism outcomes. Policy implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Atkin-Plunk, C.A., Peck, J.H., & Armstrong, G.S. (2017). Do race and ethnicity matter? An examination of racial/ethnic difference in perceptions of procedural justice and recidivism among problem-solving court clients. Race and Justice, 9(2), 151-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368717691800
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Sage in Race and Justice on February 8, 2017, available online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368717691800
Reuse restricted to noncommercial and no derivative uses.