Date of Award
12-1995
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Psychology
First Advisor
Roni Reiter-Palmon
Second Advisor
James Thomas
Third Advisor
Bridgette O. Ryalls
Abstract
Differences in judgmental models between highly differentiated individuals and poorly differentiated individuals were investigated. Level of cognitive differentiation was determined by participants’ responses to a Repertory Grid technique. Based upon previous research, it was predicted that highly differentiated individuals would engage in judgmental processes that reflected a nonadditive model, while poorly differentiated individuals would engage in more additive judgmental processes. While it was shown that highly differentiated individuals did engage in nonadditive judgmental processes and poorly differentiated individuals did engage in additive judgmental processes, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The findings are discussed in context of previous research on cognitive differentiation.
Recommended Citation
Siedis, Kristine K., "Cognitive Differentiation And Verbal Ability: A Test Of Two Judgmental Models" (1995). Student Work. 250.
https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/250