Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-8-2025
Abstract
Purpose
Chitosan-based materials are promising for wound healing because of their antibacterial efficacy, biocompatibility, and biodegradability, though their healing mechanisms remain unclear. This study explores the cellular and molecular mechanisms of wound healing with chitosan nanofibrous dressings.
Methods
Thirty-nine Sprague Dawley rats were divided into three groups based on the type of dressings administered: (1) chitosan nanofibrous dressing + transparent film, (2) commercial scaffold + transparent film, and (3) transparent film alone (control). Full-thickness wounds (2 cm × 2 cm) were created on the dorsum, splinted, and covered with dressings. Evaluations at 7, 14, and 21 days included histological analysis, and measurements of TNF-α and iNOS levels in the wounds.
Results
On day 21, epithelialization was significantly higher in the chitosan group than in the scaffold group (87.5% vs. 42.0%, p = 0.03). TNF-α levels were lower in both treatment groups compared to the controls. In the chitosan group, the CD68+/CD163+ ratio was lower than in the scaffold group (0.28 vs. 0.62, p = 0.037), and blood vessel formation was greater than in the controls.
Conclusion
These results suggest that chitosan nanofibrous dressings enhance acute wound healing in rats by promoting re-epithelialization, neovasculogenesis, and maintaining low TNF-α levels in the later phases of healing.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03842-8
Journal Title
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Volume
53
First Page
3415
Last Page
3434
Recommended Citation
Salkovskiy, Yury; Ghanbari, Mahboubeh; Jara, Carlos P; Cartwright, Sara; Mondal, Pinaki; Freel, Colman; Razian, Sayed Ahmadreza; MacTaggart, Jason; and Carlson, Mark A., "Chitosan Nanofibrous Dressing Increased Angiogenesis and Anti-inflammatory Response in an Acute Wound Model in Rats: A Comparative Study" (2025). Journal Articles. 415.
https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/biomechanicsarticles/415
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Files over 3MB may be slow to open. For best results, right-click and select "save as..."
Included in
Funded by the University of Nebraska at Omaha Open Access Fund
Comments
The pdf passed Adobe's accessibility checker prior to upload.
This article was published open access under the Criss Library (Lyrasis member) and Springer open access publishing agreement.