Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Spring 7-2022
Publication Title
Journal for the Study of Radicalism
Volume
16
Issue
1
First Page
1
Last Page
28
Abstract
Terrorism by extremist groups has garnered much political, media, and scholarly attention since 9/11.1 Although radicalization may not be a necessary cause of terrorism, it has been found to play a role in terrorist pathways, but what we mean by the term “radicalization” is still somewhat of a mystery, because its definition is ever evolving across different groups and people.2 We have all read media stories in which politicians, criminal justice professionals, and/or scholars refer to “radicalized terrorists,” assuming everyone in the United States or globally knows what they mean by “radicalized” people or “radical” terrorism. During the 2016 presidential election, then President Trump often spoke of “radical Islamic terrorism,” but what exactly did he mean by “radical” terrorism, is there nonradical terrorism, is this term being used simply as an adjective, or does the term “radical” have some substantive meaning to which politicians and scholars adhere?
Recommended Citation
McNeel, H., Sample, L., & Clinkinbeard, S. (2022, July). Construction of radicalization: Examination of an important construction in the explanation of terrorism. Journal for the Study of Radicalism, 16(1), 1-28.
Comments
© [2022] The Authors. Michigan State University. This work originally appeared in The Journal for the Study of Radicalism, Vol.16, No. 1, [2022], [1-28].