Racial (in)variance in prison rule breaking
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-2015
Publication Title
Journal of Criminal Justice
Volume
43
Issue
3
First Page
175
Last Page
185
Abstract
Purpose
Sampson and Wilson (1995) argued that the sources of crime are invariant across race, and are instead rooted in the structural differences between communities. This study involved an examination of the applicability of this thesis to incarcerated individuals.
Methods
Random samples totaling 2,388 blacks and 3,118 whites were drawn from 46 prisons in Ohio and Kentucky. Race-specific and pooled bi-level models of violent and nonviolent rule violations were estimated. Differences between race-specific models in the magnitude of regression coefficients for the same predictors and outcomes were compared.
Results
Findings revealed that individual and environmental effects were very similar between black and white inmates, although rates of violent and nonviolent rule breaking were higher for blacks. Within prisons, black inmates were also more likely than white inmates to engage in rule breaking. The individual-level relationship between race and violence was stronger in prisons with a lower ratio of black to white inmates and in prisons where inmates were more cynical towards legal authority.
Conclusions
Findings seemingly refute the applicability of the racial invariance hypothesis to an incarcerated population.
Recommended Citation
Steiner, Benjamin M. and Wooldredge, John, "Racial (in)variance in prison rule breaking" (2015). Criminology and Criminal Justice Faculty Publications. 24.
https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/criminaljusticefacpub/24