Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-22-2026
Publication Title
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Issue
Latest Articles
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2673098
Abstract
This article examines how justice perceptions shape the legitimacy of student evaluation of teaching (SET) as a high-stakes governance tool in higher education. Drawing on organisational justice theory and governance analysis, it presents a systematic review of 35 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 that examine faculty perceptions of fairness in SET and their relationship to legitimacy-related outcomes, including trust, acceptance and resistance. Using a PRISMA-guided process, studies were coded by methodological features, justice dimension and legitimacy outcomes. Five fairness frames are identified: distributive, procedural, interactional, epistemic and affective. While distributive and epistemic perspectives are slightly more prevalent, procedural and interactional frames are also well represented. Among studies reporting legitimacy-related outcomes, procedural justice shows the most consistent positive association with trust and acceptance of high-stakes SET use, whereas distributive inequities, interactional harms and validity-related concerns undermine confidence. These relationships are conditioned by employment precarity, identity-based inequality, disciplinary norms and governance regimes. The review develops a justice-based governance framework that explains why procedural integrity, rather than outcome favorability alone, underpins legitimacy, and argues that justice-sensitive governance design is central to the effective use of SET beyond psychometric refinement.
Accessibility Statement
PDF passed Adobe Accessibility Checker prior to upload.
Recommended Citation
Chen, C. K. (2026). Justice and the legitimacy of student evaluation systems in higher education: a systematic review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2673098
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Comments
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education on [May 22, 2026], available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2673098