Document Type

Article

Publication Date

7-5-2025

Publication Title

AI & SOCIETY

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02461-0

Abstract

The Belmont Report has a place of great importance in American biomedical research ethics. This paper argues that a similar kind of report, and the legal infrastructure that birthed it, is needed in the United States if we are to preempt a great many of the potential issues that are on the horizon with artificial intelligence (AI). What makes the Belmont Report so important is not just that it established a new basis for how medical professionals ought to treat their patients and experiment participants; it did so with the force of law. Establishing an equivalent legal framework for AI is going to take tremendous buy-in from a variety of private and public actors in the United States. The model afforded by the Belmont Report is well suited to generate such buy-in. While this may seem like a daunting task given various polarizing issues at play in society today, the context that produced the Belmont Report was quite fractious itself. It is the position of this paper that a similarly styled approach to AI regulation can succeed in proactively limiting the harms of AI’s use (and abuse).

Comments

The pdf passed the Adobe accessibility checker prior to upload.

This article was published open access under the Criss Library (Lyrasis member) and Springer open access publishing agreement.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS
 

Funded by the University of Nebraska at Omaha Open Access Fund