Date of Award

5-7-2026

Degree Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Department

Political Science

First Advisor

Dr. Brett Kyle

Abstract

Commitment problems explain why multiple parties cannot agree on issues of concern due to a lack of trust, even when cooperation would benefit all parties involved. These problems take place when actors cannot make credible commitments about future behavior because of mistrust, uncertainty, or the absence of neutral enforcement mechanics, leading to delays, lack of cooperation, and sometimes conflict or war. Scholars have approached commitment problems from multiple angles. Fearon (1995) identifies them as empirically observable mechanisms that prevent states from reaching peace agreements. Powell (2006) extends this framework, arguing that commitment problems are due to the inability to bind oneself to an agreement coupled with the incentive to defect from it. North and Weingast (1989) demonstrate that institutional and constitutional rules can make commitments more credible by limiting what leaders can do arbitrarily.

Comments

The author holds the copyright to this work, any reuse or permissions must be obtained from them directly. 

PDF passed Adobe's accessibility checker prior to upload.

Share

COinS