Author ORCID Identifier

Saxena - https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0328-7305

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

8-20-2017

Publication Title

Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice

Volume

10

Issue

3

First Page

376

Last Page

379

Abstract

Gloss, Carr, Reichman, Abdul-Nasiru, and Oestereich (2017) present compelling arguments on a moral/humanistic need for I-O psychologists to consider workers that are living and working in deep poverty. Their case nicely shifts focus to large percentages of global workers who heretofore have only been represented minimally in the scholarly discourse in our field. I would like to accomplish two goals in this commentary. First, I would like to present a brief historical perspective on why industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology’s focus has been on POSH workers. Second, I will provide conceptual extensions to Gloss et al.’s (2017) focal article by presenting some insights into the world of informal workers.

Comments

This is an accepted version of an article published in Cambridge's Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, published on August 20, 2017 and can be access at https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2017.29

This is copyrighted material by the publisher

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS