Impact of Local Heat Application on Markers of Myogenesis and Proteolysis
Advisor Information
Dustin Slivka
Location
MBSC Ballroom - Poster #606 - G
Presentation Type
Poster
Start Date
4-3-2022 10:45 AM
End Date
4-3-2022 12:00 PM
Abstract
Previous exercise and temperature research indicates that ambient and local application of heat may induce independent effects on muscle gene expression post-exercise. However, it is unclear if an applied local heat stimulus, at rest, may explain changes in markers of myogenesis and proteolysis. PURPOSE: To determine the impact of local heat application on markers of myogenesis and proteolysis in human skeletal muscle at rest. METHODS: Participants (n=12, 26.4±7.2yrs, 176±12cm, 83.6±18.3kg, 19.1±7.7%BF) applied a 4-hour thermal wrap to both legs, experimental (40°C) vs. control (20°C). Muscle samples were collected and processed to extract mRNA and protein. RT-qPCR was completed to measure and myogenic-related and proteolytic-related genes for changes in mRNA (via paired t-test). Proteins were separated and quantified for total protein and phosphorylated protein. RESULTS: Skin temperature (37.4±0.1°C vs. 34.9±0.2°C) and intramuscular temperature (36.3±0.4°C vs. 35.2±0.8°C) increased (both pser2448 phosphorylation was not different (p=0.981), p70Thr389 phosphorylation was not different (p=0.583), and 4E-BP1Thr37/46 phosphorylation was not different (p=0.238). CONCLUSION: Localized heat application on skeletal muscle, at rest, has no influence on gene expression. Thus, additional stimuli (e.g., exercise) are necessary to induce altered markers of myogenesis and proteolysis.
Scheduling Link
1
Impact of Local Heat Application on Markers of Myogenesis and Proteolysis
MBSC Ballroom - Poster #606 - G
Previous exercise and temperature research indicates that ambient and local application of heat may induce independent effects on muscle gene expression post-exercise. However, it is unclear if an applied local heat stimulus, at rest, may explain changes in markers of myogenesis and proteolysis. PURPOSE: To determine the impact of local heat application on markers of myogenesis and proteolysis in human skeletal muscle at rest. METHODS: Participants (n=12, 26.4±7.2yrs, 176±12cm, 83.6±18.3kg, 19.1±7.7%BF) applied a 4-hour thermal wrap to both legs, experimental (40°C) vs. control (20°C). Muscle samples were collected and processed to extract mRNA and protein. RT-qPCR was completed to measure and myogenic-related and proteolytic-related genes for changes in mRNA (via paired t-test). Proteins were separated and quantified for total protein and phosphorylated protein. RESULTS: Skin temperature (37.4±0.1°C vs. 34.9±0.2°C) and intramuscular temperature (36.3±0.4°C vs. 35.2±0.8°C) increased (both pser2448 phosphorylation was not different (p=0.981), p70Thr389 phosphorylation was not different (p=0.583), and 4E-BP1Thr37/46 phosphorylation was not different (p=0.238). CONCLUSION: Localized heat application on skeletal muscle, at rest, has no influence on gene expression. Thus, additional stimuli (e.g., exercise) are necessary to induce altered markers of myogenesis and proteolysis.