Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-1-2024
Publication Title
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting
Volume
52
Issue
2
First Page
657
Last Page
690
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12823
Abstract
Auditing theory predicts fee discounting when multiple potential successor auditors bid for the client. However, the empirical evidence on this issue varies as more recent research attributes prior evidence of fee discounting to measurement errors related to audit fees’ partial-year reporting. We argue that the mixed results of previous literature are partially attributable to a failure to identify competitive auditor changes. We use U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) disclosures of audit firm changes to identify cases with multiple potential successor auditors, which suggests more competition for the client. We compare each disclosing firm's audit fees between the first year following the auditor change year and all other years of the same disclosing firm. We find that successor audit firms discount audit fees in the first full year following the auditor change, compared to all other years, within the same disclosing firm. The fee discounting continues until at least the second full year of the engagement. Results also suggest Big N successor firms discount fees to win new engagements from smaller successor audit firms. Audit fee discounting occurs when companies dismiss their audit firm rather than when audit firms resign. Finally, we find no evidence of impaired audit quality for the 2 years following the auditor change.
Recommended Citation
Yuan, Ming (Mike), "Do audit firms discount initial full‐year audit engagements with multiple potential successor auditors?" (2024). Accounting Faculty Publications. 1.
https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/acctfacpub/1
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Funded by the University of Nebraska at Omaha Open Access Fund
Comments
PDF passed the Adobe accessibility checker prior to upload.
This was published open access under the University of Nebraska at Omaha and Wileys' open access publishing agreement.