Follow

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 1998 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG) of the WCTR Society, Volume 3

  Tae Hoon Oum, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 98-8

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 1998 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG) of the WCTR Society, Volume 4

  Tae Hoon Oum, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 98-9

• 

  The Symposium Proceedings of the 1998 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG), Volume 1

  Aisling Reynolds-Feighan, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 98-3

• 

  The Symposium Proceedings of the 1998 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG), Volume 2

  Aisling Reynolds-Feighan, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 98-4

• 

  The Symposium Proceedings of the 1998 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG), Volume 3

  Aisling Reynolds-Feighan, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 98-5

• 

  The Airline Quality Rating 1997

  Brent Bowen, Dean Headley, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 97-9

  The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method of comparing airline performance on combined multiple factors important to consumers. Development history and calculation details for the AQR rating system are detailed in The Airline Quality Rating 1991 issued in April, 1991, by the National Institute for Aviation Research at Wichita State University. This current report, Airline Quality Rating 1997, contains monthly Airline Quality Rating scores for 1996. Additional copies are available by contacting Wichita State University or University of Nebraska at Omaha. The Airline Quality Rating 1997 is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the nine major domestic U.S. airlines operating during 1996. Using the Airline Quality Rating system and monthly performance data for each airline for the calendar year of 1996, individual and comparative ratings are reported. This research monograph contains a brief summary of the AQR methodology, detailed data and charts that track comparative quality for major domestic airlines across the 12 month period of 1996, and industry average results. Also, comparative Airline Quality Rating data for 1991 through 1995 are included to provide a longer term view of quality in the industry.

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 1997 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG) of the WCTR Society Vol. 1, No. 3

  Tae Hoon Oum, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 97-4

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 1997 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG) of the WCTR Society Vol. 2, No. 2

  Tae Hoon Oum, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 97-6

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 1997 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG) of the WCTR Society Vol. 3, No. 1

  Tae Hoon Oum, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 97-7

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 1997 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG) of the WCTR Society, Vol. 1, No. 1

  Tae Hoon Oum, Brent Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 97-2

• 

  The Airline Quality Rating 1996

  Brent D. Bowen, Dean Headley, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 96-4

  The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method of comparing airline performance on combined multiple factors important to consumers. Development history and calculation details for the AQR rating system are detailed in The Airline Quality Rating issued in April, 1991, by the National Institute for Aviation Research at Wichita State University. This current report, Airline Quality Rating 1996, contains monthly Airline Quality Rating scores for 1995. Additional copies are available by contacting Wichita State University or the University of Nebraska at Omaha.

  The Airline Quality Rating 1996, contains a brief summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the nine major domestic U.S. airlines operating during 1995. Using the Airline Quality Rating system and monthly performance data for each airline for the calendar year of 1995, individual and comparative ratings are reported. This research monograph contains a brief summary of the AQR methodology, detailed data and charts that track comparative quality for major domestic airlines across the 12 month period of 1995, and industry average results. Also, comparative Airline Quality Rating data for 1991 through 1994 is included to provide a longer term view of quality in the industry.

• 

  Proceedings of the First Annual Nebraska Aviation Education Association Conference

  James E. Crehan and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 94-5

• 

  Interactive Learning: The Casewriting Method as an Entire Semester Course for Higher Education Teacher's Manual

  Brent D. Bowen, Rebecca K. Lutte, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 94-2

  This guide explains the reasons for employing the case method as a tool in the academic discipline of aviation. It promotes the use of case writing as a unique opportunity to derive even further benefits from case analysis. The benefits to students of using case writing as a learning strategy include a focus on the strategy of a real situation; development of an ownership interest; and development of reasoning, decision making, judgment, group dynamics, formal written and oral communication ability, and organizational skills. This is a teacher's guide that includes the course syllabus, schedule and practical tips on introducing the concept of case study, assigning groups, selecting a topic, and assigning roles. Other topics covered are case writing guidelines, case components, timeline for case writing of individual and group projects, case development, case presentations, case evaluations peer evaluations, group self-evaluations, examples of case writing, and a breakdown of those sample cases.

• 

  Interactive Learning: The Casewriting Method as an Entire Semester Course for Higher Education

  Brent D. Bowen and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 94-1

  This guide explains for reasons for employing the case method as a tool in the academic discipline of aviation. It promotes the use of case writing as a unique opportunity to derive even further benefits from case analysis. The benefits to students of using case writing as a learning strategy include a focus on the strategy of a real situation; development of an ownership interest; and development of reasoning, decision making, judgement, group dynamic, formal written and oral communication ability, and organizational skills. Issues related to computerization, research, and internalization are also addressed. Among the topics covered are case writing guidelines, case components, time line for case writing presentations, case evaluations, peer evaluations, group self-evaluations, examples of case writing, and a breakdown of those sample cases.