Follow

• 

  Engaging the Next Generation of Aviation Professionals

  Suzanne K. Kearns Ed., Timothy J. Mavin Ed., Steven Hodge Ed., and Chenyu "Victor" Huang

  Engaging the Next Generation of Aviation Professionals is an edited volume that brings together a diverse set of academic and professional perspectives within the three themes of attracting, educating, and retaining the next generation of aviation professionals (NGAP). This compilation is the first academic work specifically targeting this critical issue.

  The book presents a rich variety of perspectives, academic philosophies, and real-world examples. Submissions include brief case studies, longer scholarly works from respected academics, and professional reflections from individuals who have made important contributions to their field. The book includes academic chapters that explore the topic from a more theoretical standpoint yet are accessible and understandable to a professional audience. These are complemented by both broad and specific practice examples that describe initiatives and applications occurring in the industry around the three themes. All submissions include descriptive insights, experiences, and first-hand accounts of accomplishments, intended to support the work of other professionals managing NGAP issues.

  This work will be valuable to anyone involved in attracting, educating, or retaining NGAP, including academics, operators, national and international regulators, and outreach coordinators, among many others.

• 

  The Airline Quality Rating 2004

  Brent D. Bowen, Dean Headley, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 04-1

  The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method of comparing airline quality on combined multiple performance criteria. This current report, the Airline Quality Rating 2004, reflects monthly Airline Quality Rating scores for 2003. AQR scores far the calendar year 2003 are based on 15 elements in four major areas that focus on airline performance aspects important to air travel consumers.

  The Airline Quality Rating 2004 is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for U.S. airlines that have at least 1% of domestic passenger volume during 2003. Using the Airline Quality Rating system of weighted averages and monthly performance data in the areas of on-time arrivals, involuntary denied boardings, mishandled baggage, and a combination of 12 customer complaint categories, airlines’ comparative performance for the calendar year of 2003 is reported. This research monograph contains a brief summary of the AQR methodology, detailed data and charts that track comparative quality for domestic airline operations for the 12-month period of 2003, and industry results. Also, comparative Airline Quality Rating data for 2002 are included, where available, to provide historical perspective regarding performance quality in the industry.

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 2003 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) World Conference, Volume 3

  Brent D. Bowen, Sveinn Gudmundsson, Tae Hoon Oum, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 03-7

• 

  The Airline Quality Rating 2003

  Brent D. Bowen, Dean Headley, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 03-1

  The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method of comparing airline quality on combined multiple performance criteria. This current report, the Airline Quality Rating 2003, reflects monthly Airline Quality Rating scores for 2002. AQR scores for the calendar year 2002 are based on 15 elements that focus on airline performance areas important to air travel consumers.

  The Airline Quality Rating 2003 is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the 10 largest U.S. airlines operating during 2002. Using the Airline Quality Rating system of weighted averages and monthly performance data in the areas of on-time arrivals, involuntary denied boardings, mishandled baggage, and a combination of 12 customer complaint categories, airlines’ comparative performance for the calendar year of 2002 is reported. This research monograph contains a brief summary of the AQR methodology, detailed data and charts that track comparative quality for domestic airline operations for the 12-month period of 2002, and industry average results. Also, comparative Airline Quality Rating data for 2001 are included for each airline to provide historical perspective regarding performance quality in the industry.

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 2003 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) World Conference, Vol. 2

  Brent Bowen, Sveinn Gudmundsson, Tae Hoon Oum, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 03-6

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 2003 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) World Conference, Volume 1

  Brent Bowen, Sveinn Gudmundsson, Tae Hoon Oum, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 03-5

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 2003 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) World Conference, Volume 5

  Brent Bowen, Sveinn Gudmundsson, Tae Hoon Oum, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 03-9

• 

  The Aeronautics Education, Research, and Industry Alliance (AERIAL) 2002 Report

  Brent D. Bowen, Mary M. Fink, Jocelyn S. Nickerson, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 02-7

  The NASA Nebraska Space Grant Consortium (NSGC) & EPSCoR programs at the University I of Nebraska at Omaha are involved in a variety of innovative research activities. Such research is supported through the Aeronautics Education, Research, and Industry Alliance (AERIAL) and collaborative seed funds. AERIAL is a comprehensive, mulch-faceted, five year NASA EPSCoR initiative that contributes substantially to the strategic research and technology priorities of NASA while intensifying Nebraska’s rapidly growing aeronautics research and development endeavors.

  AERIAL includes three major collaborative research teams (CRTs) whose nexus is a common focus in aeronautics research. Each CRT - Small Aircraft Transportation System (SATS), Airborne Remote Sensing for Agricultural Research and Commercialization Applications (ARS), and Numerical Simulation of the Combustion of Fuel Droplets: Finite Rate Kinetics and Flame Zone Grid Adaptation (CEFD) - has a distinct research agenda. This program provides the template for funding of new and innovative research that emphasizes aerospace technology.

• 

  The Proceedings of the NASA Aerospace Technology Symposium 2002

  Brent D. Bowen, Mary M. Fink, Michaela M. Schaaf, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 02-4

• 

  The Airline Quality Rating 2002

  Brent D. Bowen, Dean Headley, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 02-2

  The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method of comparing airline quality on combined multiple performance criteria. This current report, Airline Quality Rating 2002, reflects monthly Airline Quality Rating scores for 2001. AQR scores for the calendar year 2001 are based on 15 elements that focus on airline performance areas important to air travel consumers.

  The Airline Quality Rating 2002 is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the 11 largest U.S. airlines operating during 2001. Using the Airline Quality Rating system of weighted averages and monthly performance data in the areas of on-time arrivals, involuntary denied boardings, mishandled baggage, and a combination of 12 customer complaint categories, airlines comparative performance for the calendar year of 2001 is reported. This research monograph contains a brief summary of the AQR methodology, detailed data and charts that track comparative quality for domestic airline operations for the 12-month period of 2001, and industry average results. Also, comparative Airline Quality Rating data for 2000 are included for each airline to provide historical perspective regarding performance quality in the industry.

• 

  Nebraska Initiative for Aerospace Research and Industrial Development (NIARID): Final Report

  Brent D. Bowen and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 02-1

  The Nebraska Initiative for Aerospace Research and Industrial Development (NIARID) was designed to accelerate the state’s efforts to expand its capacity, national competitiveness, and infrastructure in aerospace research and industry. The systemic goal of the NIARID was to strengthen Nebraska’s long-term ability to develop new, and strengthen current, aerospace research activities that increase the state’s national research competitiveness, foster sustainable growth in aerospace-related industry and the state’s economic development; complement the mission and activities of the Nebraska Space Grant Consortium (NSGC); and advance the goals of NASA and its enterprises. Funding from NIARID accelerated the establishment of a permanent national-level research and education center in aerospace science in Nebraska.

  The NIARID was founded on, and drew from, a number of supportive structures already in place in the state, including the NSGC, Nebraska EPSCoR, the Nebraska Research Initiative, the Aviation Institute, and the Department of Economic Development

  The NlARID was a program of focused research and infrastructure strengthening, junior faculty development, educational outreach, industrial development, and long-term strategic planning. It took active measures to broaden the spectrum of aerospace research and industry in the state by encouraging the development of innovative scientific investigations. Its structure ensured effective technology transfer by actively involving industry in all facets of its implementation. It was designed to ensure that Nebraska’s aerospace research and development continues to thrive long after NIARID funding ends.

• 

  The Family Science Starter Kit: A Manual to Assist You in the Development of a Family Aeronautical Science Program

  Henry R. Leher and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 02-6

  This book is designed to involve families working together on several different hands-on activities during evening meetings at school. The basis for these activities is the in-school study of related science and mathematical concepts and topics by the students in each family. The program provides an opportunity for families to work together in an interesting and enjoyable manner. The Family Aeronautical Science demonstration project consisted of three parts: (1) the in-school study of aeronautics during select science classes; (2) the extensive after-school use of the school’s computer laboratory; and (3) evening Family Aeronautical Science Nights. Key parts of the in-class work included the study of basic aerodynamics, flight control systems, wing design, and basic flights maneuvers. The educational paradigm was that students and teachers would cover several appropriate parts of the study at school and the students would continue study after school house with family members in the computer labs using an aeronautics CD.

• 

  Partnership and the Revitalization of Aviation: A Study of the Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiments Program, 1994-2001

  Nanette Scarpellini Metz and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 02-5

  As the Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiments (AGATE) program completes its eight-year plan, the outcomes and industry effects reveal its successes and problems. AGATE engaged several different types of institutions, including federal agencies, business and industry, universities, and non-profit organizations. By examining the perceptions of those intimately involved as well as periphery members, this study shows the powerful consequences of this type of combination both now and in the future. The problems are a particularly useful illustration of the inter-working of a jointly funded research and development initiative. By learning how these problems are addressed, the study reveals lessons that may be applied to future government-industry partnerships.

• 

  The Airline Quality Rating 2001

  Brent D. Bowen, Dean Headley, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 01-2

  The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method of comparing airline quality on combined multiple performance criteria. This current report, Airline Quality Rating 2001, reflects monthly Airline Quality Rating scores for 2000. AQR scores for the calendar year 2000 are based on 15 elements that focus on airline performance areas important to air travel consumers.

  The Airline Quality Rating 2001 is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the ten major U.S. airlines operating during 2000. Using the Airline Quality Rating system of weighted averages and monthly performance data in the areas of on-time arrivals, involuntary denied boardings, mishandled baggage, and a combination of 12 customer complaint categories, major airlines comparative performance for the calendar year of 2000 is reported. This research monograph contains a brief summary of the AQR methodology, detailed data and charts that track comparative quality for major airlines domestic operations for the 12-month period of 2000, and industry average results. Also, comparative Airline Quality Rating data for 1999 are included for each airline to provide historical perspective regarding performance quality in the industry.

• 

  Collegiate Aviation Research and Education Solutions to Critical Safety Issues

  Brent D. Bowen and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 2001-5

  This document contains four papers concerning collegiate aviation research and education solutions to critical safety issues. “Panel Proposal Titled Collegiate Aviation Research and Education Solutions to Critical Safety Issues for the Tim Forte Collegiate Aviation Safety Symposium” (Brent Bowen) presents proposals for panels on the following topics: geographic north versus magnetic north to provide enhanced national airspace system safety; weather safety training for general aviation pilots through computer flight simulation; identification of human behavior and aircraft maintenance safety issues; disaster preparedness, emergency response, and curriculum development; the collegiate aviation emergency response checklist; and systemic initiatives in aviation safety research. “Current Regulatory Status in Regard to Maintenance Resource Management” (Chien-tsung Lu, Brent Bowen) explores documents, evidence, and perspectives on maintenance resource management training. “Disaster Preparedness, Emergency Response, and Curriculum Development” (Michaela M. Schaaf, Brent D. Bowen) discusses a new upper-level aviation course at the University of Nebraska at Omaha that grew out of research in the area of safety, disaster preparedness, and emergency response. “The Collegiate Aviation Emergency Response Checklist: Fundamental Pre-crisis Planning” (Mary M. Fink, Michael K. Larson) discusses and presents the University of Nebraska at Omaha Aviation Institute’s emergency response checklist, which is designed for use is a flight student is involved in an aircraft accident or incident.

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 2001 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) of the WCTR Society, Volume 2

  Yeong-Heok Lee, Brent D. Bowen, Scott E. Tarry, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 01-7

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 2001 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) of the WCTR Society, Volume 3

  Yeong-Heok Lee, Brent D. Bowen, Scott E. Tarry, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 01-8

• 

  The Airline Quality Rating 2000

  Brent D. Bowen, Dean Headley, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 2000-2

  The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method of comparing airline performance on combined multiple criteria. This current report, Airline Quality Rating 2000, reflects monthly Airline Quality Rating scores for 1999. AQR scores for the calendar year 1999 are based on 14 elements that focus on airline performance areas important to air travel consumers.

  The Airline Quality Rating 2000 is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the ten major domestic U.S. airlines operating during 1998. Using the Airline Quality Rating system of weighted averages and monthly performance data in the areas of on-time arrivals, involuntary denied boardings, mishandled baggage, and a combination of 11 customer complaint categories, major airlines comparative performance for the calendar year of 1999 is reported. This research monograph contains a brief summary of the AQR methodology, detailed data and charts that track comparative quality for major airlines domestic operations for the 12 month period of 1999, and industry average results. Also, comparative Airline Quality Rating data for 1998, are included for each airline to provide historical perspective regarding quality in the industry.

• 

  The University of Nebraska at Omaha Center for Space Data Use in Teaching and Learning

  Neal Grandgenett and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 2000-4

  Within the context of innovative coursework and other educational activities, we are proposing the establishment of a University of Nebraska at Omaha Center for the Use of Space Data in Teaching and Learning. This Center will provide an exciting and motivating process for educators at all levels to become involved in professional development and training which engages real life applications of mathematics, science, and technology. The Center will facilitate innovative courses (including online and distance education formats), systematic degree programs, classroom research initiatives, new instructional methods and tools, engaging curriculum materials, and various symposiums. It will involve the active participation of several Departments and Colleges on the UNO campus and be well integrated into the campus environment. It will have a direct impact on pre-service and in-service educators, the K12 students that they teach, and other college students of various science, mathematics, and technology related disciplines, in which they share coursework.

• 

  The Airline Quality Rating 1999

  Brent D. Bowen, Dean Headley, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 99-3

  he Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method of comparing airline performance on combined multiple criteria. This current report, Airline Quality Rating 1999, contains monthly Airline Quality Rating scores for 1998. Additional copies are available by contacting Wichita State University or the University of Nebraska at Omaha.

  The Airline Quality Rating 1999 is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the ten major domestic U.S. airlines operating during 1998. Using the Airline Quality Rating system of weighted averages and montly performance data in the areas of on-time arrivals, involuntary denied boardings, mishandled baggage, and a combination of 12 customer complaint categories, major airlines comparative performance for the calendar year of 1998 is reported. This research monograph contains a brief summary of the AQR methodology, detailed data and charts that track comparative quality for major airlines domestic operations for the 12 month period of 1998, and industry average results. Also, comparative Airline Quality Rating data for 1997, using the updated criteria, are included to provide a reference point regarding quality in the industry.

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 1999 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG) of the WCTR Society, Volume 2

  Anming Zhang, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 99-6

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 1999 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG) of the WCTR Society, Volume 3

  Anming Zhang, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 99-7

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 1999 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG) of the WCTR Society, Volume 4

  Anming Zhang, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 99-8

• 

  The Airline Quality Rating 1998

  Brent Bowen, Dean Headley, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 98-1

  The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method of comparing airline performance on combined multiple factors important to consumers. Development history and calculation details for the AQR rating system are detailed in The Airline Quality Rating issued in April, 1991, by the National Institute for Aviation Research at Wichita State University. This current report, Airline Quality Rating 1998, contains monthly Airline Quality Rating scores for 1997. Additional copies are available by contacting Wichita State University or the University of Nebraska at Omaha.

  The Airline Quality Rating 1998 is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the nine major domestic U.S. airlines operating during 1997. Using the Airline Quality Rating system and monthly performance data for each airline for the calendar year of 1997, individual and comparative ratings are reported. This research monograph contains a brief summary of the AQR methodology, detailed data and charts that track comparative quality for major domestic airlines across the 12 month period of 1997, and industry average results. Also, comparative Airline Quality Rating data for 1991 through 1996 is included to provide a longer term view of quality in the industry.

• 

  The Conference Proceedings of the 1998 Air Transport Research Group (ATRG) of the WCTR Society, Volume 1

  Tae Hoon Oum, Brent D. Bowen, and UNO Aviation Institute

  UNOAI Report 98-6