Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-2016
Publication Title
Journal of Management Information Systems
Volume
32
Issue
4
First Page
215
Last Page
245
Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of an automatic system for detection of deception by individuals with the use of multiple indicators of such potential deception. Deception detection research in the information systems discipline has postulated increased accuracy through a new class of screening systems that automatically conduct interviews and track multiple indicators of deception simultaneously. Understanding the robustness of this new class of systems and the limitations of its theoretical improved performance is important for refinement of the conceptual design. The design science proof-of-concept study presented here implemented and evaluated the robustness of these systems for automated screening for deception detection. A large experiment was used to evaluate the effectiveness of a constructed multiple-indicator system, both under normal conditions and with the presence of common types of countermeasures (mental and physical). The results shed light on the relative strength and robustness of various types of deception indicators within this new context. The findings further suggest the possibility of increased accuracy through the measurement of multiple indicators if classification algorithms can compensate for human attempts to counter effectiveness.
Recommended Citation
Twyman, Nathan; Proudfoot, Jeffrey Gainer; Schuetzler, Ryan M.; Elkins, Aaron; and Derrick, Douglas C., "Robustness of Multiple Indicators in Automated Screening Systems for Deception Detection" (2016). Information Systems and Quantitative Analysis Faculty Publications. 42.
https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/isqafacpub/42
Comments
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Management Information Systems on 13 April 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07421222.2015.1138569.