Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-22-2024
Publication Title
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Volume
97
Issue
3
First Page
791
Last Page
816
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12491
Abstract
We examined how potential job candidates react to a hiring organization that requests diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) statements, which conservatives in the United States and elsewhere have criticized as being unrelated to job function and inappropriately political or ideological. Across three studies (two of which were pre-registered), we compared reactions to requests for DEI (vs. teamwork or conservative values) statements as a function of race (Black vs. White), political conservatism and symbolic racism (Total N = 1108). When a DEI (vs. teamwork or politically conservative values) statement was requested, participants who were more (vs. less) conservative perceived the organization as less just, expressed less interest in the job, and expected poorer person-organization fit, even when a job-related rationale was provided. Further, participants who were more (vs. less) conservative evaluated a request for a statement consistent with conservative values more favourably. Thus, criticisms that DEI statements are overly political are not applied to other statements that might elicit similar concerns. Moreover, an internal meta-analysis suggested that the relationships of conservatism to justice and interest (but not person-organization fit) in response to requests for DEI (vs. teamwork) statements were not independent of racism. Findings were consistent with social dominance theory; racism may underlie seemingly race-neutral backlash to DEI statements.
Recommended Citation
Folberg, Abigail M.; Dueland, Laura J. Brooks; Swanson, Matthew; Stepanek, Sarah; Hebl, Mikki; and Ryan, Carey S., "Racism underlies seemingly race-neutral conservative criticisms of DEI statements among Black and White people in the United States" (2024). Psychology Faculty Publications. 354.
https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/psychfacpub/354
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Files over 3MB may be slow to open. For best results, right-click and select "save as..."
Included in
Funded by the University of Nebraska at Omaha Open Access Fund
Comments
The pdf passed the Adobe accessibility checker prior to upload.
This article was published open access under the Wiley and University of Nebraska at Omaha open access publishing agreement.