Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2-2025
Publication Title
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Volume
25
Issue
1
First Page
e12449
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12449
Abstract
Many people in the United States express anti-LGBT attitudes and oppose LGBT rights. These views are perpetuated when others, including allies, tolerate expressions of anti-LGBT bias. In this study, we adapted and validated a measure of tolerance of homonegativity and transnegativity (TOHT), and assessed its associations with evaluations of LGBT people, straight people, support for LGBT rights, and system-justifying ideologies among heterosexual, straight, binary-gendered/non-trans (i.e., cisgender) women and men who identified as liberal, moderate, or conservative (N = 295). Participants completed measures of TOHT, evaluations of LGBT people, support for LGBT rights, authoritarianism, religiosity, and contact with LGBT people. Analyses by gender and political ideology indicated that all groups tolerated anti-LGBT bias to some degree. Among conservatives, women (vs. men) endorsed TOHT more and exhibited less support for LGBT rights; the opposite was true of liberals. As expected, higher TOHT scores were associated with cooler evaluations of LGBT people and less support for LGBT rights. However, after controlling for system justifying motives, that was only significant for conservatives and moderates potentially suggesting that conservatives and liberals may endorse TOHT for different reasons. Overall, findings suggest that groups traditionally regarded as allies (e.g., women, liberals) tolerate attitudes that disadvantage LGBT people.
Recommended Citation
Folberg, Abigail M.; Hunt, Jennifer S.; and Riggle, Ellen D.B., "Tolerance of homonegativity and transnegativity predicts negative evaluations of LGBT people and LGBT-supportive policies among US-based heterosexual, cisgender participants" (2025). Psychology Faculty Publications. 356.
https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/psychfacpub/356
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Files over 3MB may be slow to open. For best results, right-click and select "save as..."
Included in
Funded by the University of Nebraska at Omaha Open Access Fund
Comments
The pdf passed the Adobe accessibility checker prior to upload.
This article was published open access under the Wiley and University of Nebraska at Omaha open access publishing agreement.